The Absolute Effect / Germ Cell Tumours / Imaging

TRISST / MRC TE24

Clinical question

After orchiectomy for stage I seminoma managed with surveillance, can MRI replace CT and can surveillance be reduced from seven scans to three without an unacceptable increase in advanced relapse?

Population / design

Phase III noninferiority factorial trial in stage I seminoma after orchiectomy, with no planned adjuvant treatment. Patients were randomized to seven CTs, seven MRIs, three CTs or three MRIs.

Primary outcome

Six-year incidence of Royal Marsden stage ≥IIC relapse (>5 cm). The noninferiority margin was 5.7 percentage points.

Absolute effect

MRI vs CT: stage ≥IIC relapse 0.6% vs 2.6%; absolute difference −1.9 percentage points (90% CI −3.5 to −0.3). MRI therefore met noninferiority.

Three vs seven scans: stage ≥IIC relapse 2.8% vs 0.3%; absolute increase 2.5 points (90% CI 1.0–4.1), remaining below the prespecified 5.7-point margin. This supports reduced scanning while acknowledging a small increase in advanced relapse.

Interpretation

TRISST is primarily an imaging/surveillance de-escalation trial. It shows that MRI can replace CT and that three scans can preserve a low risk of advanced relapse while reducing cumulative imaging burden.

Primary source

Journal of Clinical Oncology TRISST report.

Current-practice context · reviewed 14 October 2026

TRISST supports MRI as an alternative to CT for surveillance after orchiectomy in stage I seminoma, and supports reducing scheduled scans from seven to three while accepting a small increase in advanced relapse that remained within the prespecified non-inferiority margin. The trial does not justify omitting surveillance or adjuvant treatment without considering the patient's stage, relapse risk, local imaging expertise and ability to attend follow-up.

TRISST primary report ↗ · EAU testicular-cancer guidance ↗