← Back to The Absolute Effect
Bladder Cancer · Medical Oncology · Evidence review 2026-10-14

SWOG S1605

Does systemic atezolizumab provide sufficient durable response in BCG-unresponsive high-risk NMIBC to support bladder preservation?

Population
Phase II study in BCG-unresponsive high-risk NMIBC; 74 patients with CIS and 55 with Ta/T1 disease were evaluable in the reported cohorts.
Experimental treatment
Atezolizumab IV every 3 weeks in a single-arm phase II study.
Comparator
No randomized comparator.
Study design
Single-arm phase II study

Key reported outcomes

Values are reproduced from the linked sources. Bars are a visual aid and are scaled within each outcome row; do not compare bar lengths across different endpoints.

Complete response at 6 months in CIS
Treatment
27%

27%

18-month event-free survival in Ta/T1 cohort
Treatment
49%

49%

Grade 3–5 treatment-related AEs
Treatment
16%

16%

Among 74 patients with CIS, 20 (27%) achieved complete response at 6 months. In Ta/T1 disease, 18-month EFS was 49%. Grade 3–5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 16%, including three treatment-related deaths.

Critical appraisal

The prespecified efficacy threshold was not met; the study had small cohorts and substantial ineligibility. The toxicity and progression risks weigh heavily when comparing systemic immunotherapy with cystectomy or approved bladder-preserving approaches.

Absolute-effect discipline: NNT/NNH is not calculated unless a defensible absolute difference and a common time horizon are available. Median survival differences and hazard ratios alone are not converted into NNT.

Current-practice context

Reviewed 2026-10-14; this is a dated evidence-context note, not a substitute for local guidelines or individual clinical judgement.

Investigational/historical evidence; atezolizumab is not an approved standard treatment for BCG-unresponsive NMIBC. Use the page to understand the limits of checkpoint blockade in this setting, not as a treatment recommendation.

Freshness status: this page has a dated context and source links, but is not a claim that every relevant guideline or subsequent publication has been exhaustively reviewed.

Sources