The Absolute Effect / Evidence / SWOG 8710
Bladder Cancer · Medical Oncology · Neoadjuvant

SWOG 8710

Clinical question

Does neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy improve survival before cystectomy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer?

Trial context
Population
307 evaluable patients with T2–T4a N0 M0 muscle-invasive bladder cancer
Intervention
Neoadjuvant MVAC + radical cystectomy vs radical cystectomy alone
Key endpoint
5-year overall survival
Time horizon / follow-up
Median follow-up about 8.5 years
Absolute Effect

What changes for patients?

Neoadjuvant MVAC increased 5-year OS from 43% to 57%, an absolute benefit of 14 percentage points (NNT 8), with median OS 77 vs 46 months. Pathologic complete response was 38% vs 15%. NNT is based on 5-year overall survival.

NNT: 8

Treatment burden / harm

Chemotherapy treatment burden

NNH: Not quantifiable from the long-term publication; acute MVAC toxicity should be reported in text

Relative effect

HR: Death HR about 0.67

5-year OS P=.06; median OS 77 vs 46 months

Clinical interpretation

SWOG 8710 established that neoadjuvant MVAC before cystectomy improves survival for cisplatin-eligible MIBC, providing a foundation for modern perioperative systemic therapy.

Primary publication

← Return to The Absolute Effect

Current-practice context · reviewed 14 October 2026

SWOG 8710 established the survival benefit of neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy before cystectomy for eligible muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Current practice uses cisplatin-based perioperative chemotherapy or newer perioperative regimens in appropriate patients; renal function, hearing, neuropathy, performance status and treatment availability determine eligibility. This trial does not support cisplatin in patients who are medically ineligible.

SWOG 8710 primary/registry source ↗ · Current guideline guidance ↗