The Absolute Effect / Evidence index

Supportive / Treatment Toxicity · Phase III double-blind placebo-controlled; N=165 with persistent CIT in GI cancers. Romiplostim vs placebo for three chemotherapy cycles. Primary endpoint: no CIT-related chemotherapy dose modification in cycles 2 and 3. · No dose modification: 84% (92/109) vs 36% (20/56)

RECITE

Clinical question: Does romiplostim prevent chemotherapy dose modifications in patients with persistent chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia?

No dose modification: 84% (92/109) vs 36% (20/56); OR 10.16 (95% CI 4.44–23.72; P<0.001). Absolute gain 48 points; NNT 3. · Registry:

Design, population and treatment

Phase III double-blind placebo-controlled; N=165 with persistent CIT in GI cancers. Romiplostim vs placebo for three chemotherapy cycles. Primary endpoint: no CIT-related chemotherapy dose modification in cycles 2 and 3.

Key efficacy outcome

84 · intervention
36
84 · comparator
NNT 3 for avoiding a CIT-related chemotherapy dose modification across cycles 2–3; approximate NNH 7 for grade ≥3 AEs (many reflected chemotherapy effects).

Grade ≥3 AEs 37% vs 22% (descriptive NNH 7); thromboembolic events 2% vs 0%. Drug-attributed events uncommon.

Safety and absolute effect

No CIT-related dose modification (%)

https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2511882

Interpretation and limitations

Current-practice context · 14 November 2026: Primary publication/abstract and trial identifier checked. Guideline-level current-practice mapping was not established in this publication-led batch; no NCCN citation provenance is claimed. Where detailed QoL, follow-up or toxicity data were not present in the retrieved abstract, they are not inferred.

Primary source

Primary publication · DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2511882