The Absolute Effect / Evidence / PRIME II
Breast Cancer · Radiation Oncology · RT Omission

PRIME II

Clinical question

In older women with low-risk HR-positive node-negative breast cancer, what is the absolute benefit of adjuvant breast RT?

Trial context
Population
1,326 women ≥65 years with low-risk HR-positive node-negative breast cancer
Intervention
Whole-breast RT vs no RT after BCS + endocrine therapy
Key endpoint
10-year local recurrence
Time horizon / follow-up
10 years
Absolute Effect

What changes for patients?

10-year local recurrence was 0.9% with RT versus 9.5% without RT, an absolute reduction of 8.6 percentage points (NNT 12). Overall survival was essentially identical, 80.7% vs 80.8%. NNT is based on 10-year local recurrence.

NNT: 12

Treatment burden / harm

Additional RT toxicity

NNH: Not quantifiable from the trial's main reported toxicity data

Relative effect

HR: 10.4 for no RT vs RT

95% CI 4.1–26.1

Clinical interpretation

PRIME II shows that omitting RT in carefully selected older women on endocrine therapy increases local recurrence without changing overall survival at 10 years.

Primary publication

← Return to The Absolute Effect

Current-practice context · reviewed 14 October 2026

PRIME II supports omitting breast radiotherapy for carefully selected older women with low-risk HR-positive, node-negative disease who will take endocrine therapy, accepting a higher 10-year local recurrence risk without an overall-survival penalty. Selection depends on tumour size/grade, margins, endocrine adherence, life expectancy and patient preferences; omission should not be generalized to higher-risk biology or patients unlikely to take endocrine therapy.

PRIME II primary/registry source ↗ · Current guideline guidance ↗