The Absolute Effect / Oncology Evidence / Evidence Index

Biliary Tract Cancer · Medical · Advanced / Metastatic · First-line unresectable locally advanced/metastatic biliary tract cancer

KEYNOTE-966

In previously untreated unresectable or metastatic biliary tract cancer, does pembrolizumab added to gemcitabine-cisplatin improve overall survival?

Registry: NCT04003636 · Evidence reviewed 9 November 2026 · Aliases and follow-up publications consolidated.

Phase III double-blind placebo-controlled; n=1,069.Primary-source evidence summary

Study design, population and eligibility

Design and sample

Phase III double-blind placebo-controlled; n=1,069.

Population

Previously untreated unresectable locally advanced/metastatic BTC.

Treatment and comparator

Intervention: Pembrolizumab + gemcitabine/cisplatin.

Comparator: Placebo + gemcitabine/cisplatin.

Endpoints

OS primary.

Key efficacy and clinical outcomes

Median OS 12.7 vs 10.9 mo (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.72–0.95); grade 3–4 treatment-related AEs 70% vs 69%; extended follow-up HR 0.86.

Source-reported outcome visualization

Values are reproduced from the cited report; bars are scaled within this figure. First-line unresectable locally advanced/metastatic biliary tract cancer

Median OS pembrolizumab+GemCis
12.7%
Median OS placebo+GemCis
10.9%

Median survival and hazard ratios are not fixed-time event risks; NNT is not inferred from them.

Toxicity and treatment burden

High grade 3–4 toxicity in both arms; immune-related events added with pembrolizumab.

Absolute effect and NNT/NNH

Modest median OS difference; do not cross-compare directly with TOPAZ-1 due design/schedule differences.

NNT/NNH is not calculated unless a directly reported, comparable fixed-time risk difference supports it. Median survival and hazard ratios alone do not provide an NNT.

Critical interpretation and limitations

Modest median OS difference; do not cross-compare directly with TOPAZ-1 due design/schedule differences.

This page is an evidence summary, not a substitute for multidisciplinary assessment or patient-specific decision-making.

Current-practice context

Review date: 9 November 2026. Primary publication and selected follow-up sources were reviewed. Full disease-specific guideline, regulatory-label and sequencing audit remains pending; verify current local recommendations and biomarker eligibility before clinical application.

Primary publication and authoritative source

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37075781/

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04003636