KEYNOTE-361
In untreated advanced urothelial carcinoma, did adding pembrolizumab to platinum-based chemotherapy improve PFS or OS versus chemotherapy alone?
Key reported outcomes
Values are reproduced from the linked sources. Bars are a visual aid and are scaled within each outcome row; do not compare bar lengths across different endpoints.
For pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy, median PFS was 8.3 versus 7.1 months (HR 0.78; nominal P=0.0033) and median OS 17.0 versus 14.3 months (HR 0.86; nominal P=0.0407). The prespecified statistical boundary for OS was not crossed, so formal superiority was not established.
Critical appraisal
The trial's hierarchical testing plan matters: nominal P values cannot be interpreted as a positive confirmatory primary result after the required boundary was missed. Avoid describing the combination as practice-changing based on this study.
Absolute-effect discipline: NNT/NNH is not calculated unless a defensible absolute difference and a common time horizon are available. Median survival differences and hazard ratios alone are not converted into NNT.
Current-practice context
Reviewed 2026-10-14; this is a dated evidence-context note, not a substitute for local guidelines or individual clinical judgement.
Historical negative/unsuccessful confirmatory phase III trial for pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy. Contemporary first-line options have changed, including EV–pembrolizumab and nivolumab plus gemcitabine–cisplatin for selected cisplatin-eligible patients; use current local guidelines.
Freshness status: this page has a dated context and source links, but is not a claim that every relevant guideline or subsequent publication has been exhaustively reviewed.