The Absolute Effect / Oncology Evidence / Evidence Index

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer · Medical · Advanced / Metastatic · First-line locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC · PD-L1 TPS ≥1%

KEYNOTE-042

In untreated advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS ≥1% and no EGFR/ALK alteration, does pembrolizumab monotherapy improve overall survival over platinum chemotherapy?

Registry: NCT02220894 · Evidence reviewed 9 November 2026 · Aliases and follow-up publications consolidated.

Phase III open-label randomized; n=1,274.Primary-source evidence summary

Study design, population and eligibility

Design and sample

Phase III open-label randomized; n=1,274.

Population

Untreated locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC, PD-L1 TPS ≥1%, EGFR/ALK wild-type.

Treatment and comparator

Intervention: Pembrolizumab monotherapy.

Comparator: Platinum chemotherapy.

Endpoints

OS tested hierarchically in TPS ≥50%, ≥20%, then ≥1%.

Key efficacy and clinical outcomes

At 61.1-mo follow-up, OS HR 0.68 (TPS≥50%), 0.75 (≥20%), 0.79 (≥1%); 5-y OS estimates 21.9%, 19.4%, 16.6% respectively.

Source-reported outcome visualization

Values are reproduced from the cited report; bars are scaled within this figure. First-line locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC · PD-L1 TPS ≥1%

5-y OS TPS≥1% pembrolizumab
16.6%
5-y OS TPS≥1% chemotherapy
8.5%

Median survival and hazard ratios are not fixed-time event risks; NNT is not inferred from them.

Toxicity and treatment burden

Immune-mediated AEs; risk of early progression with monotherapy must be considered.

Absolute effect and NNT/NNH

The broad ≥1% group contains the ≥50% group; modest overall benefit does not make monotherapy best for every patient.

NNT/NNH is not calculated unless a directly reported, comparable fixed-time risk difference supports it. Median survival and hazard ratios alone do not provide an NNT.

Critical interpretation and limitations

The broad ≥1% group contains the ≥50% group; modest overall benefit does not make monotherapy best for every patient.

This page is an evidence summary, not a substitute for multidisciplinary assessment or patient-specific decision-making.

Current-practice context

Review date: 9 November 2026. Primary publication and selected follow-up sources were reviewed. Full disease-specific guideline, regulatory-label and sequencing audit remains pending; verify current local recommendations and biomarker eligibility before clinical application.

Primary publication and authoritative source

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36306479/

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02220894