EV-303 / KEYNOTE-905
For cisplatin-ineligible or cisplatin-declining patients with operable MIBC, does perioperative enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab improve outcomes over immediate cystectomy?
Key reported outcomes
Values are reproduced from the linked sources. Bars are a visual aid and are scaled within each outcome row; do not compare bar lengths across different endpoints.
At the reported analysis, 2-year EFS was 74.7% versus 39.4% and 2-year OS was 79.7% versus 63.1%; pCR was 57.1% versus 8.6%. EFS HR 0.40 (95% CI 0.28–0.57); OS HR 0.50 (95% CI 0.33–0.74).
Critical appraisal
Open-label phase III trial; treatment adds substantial systemic toxicity and requires perioperative EV and pembrolizumab. pCR is not a substitute for long-term survival. Discuss surgical fitness, neuropathy, rash, hyperglycaemia and immune-mediated toxicity.
Absolute-effect discipline: NNT/NNH is not calculated unless a defensible absolute difference and a common time horizon are available. Median survival differences and hazard ratios alone are not converted into NNT.
Current-practice context
Reviewed 2026-10-14; this is a dated evidence-context note, not a substitute for local guidelines or individual clinical judgement.
US FDA approval was granted in November 2025 for cisplatin-ineligible MIBC candidates for cystectomy. The 2026 evidence atlas should distinguish this perioperative regimen from NIAGARA's cisplatin-based perioperative durvalumab strategy and from EV-304 in cisplatin-eligible patients.
Freshness status: this page has a dated context and source links, but is not a claim that every relevant guideline or subsequent publication has been exhaustively reviewed.