Bladder Cancer · Medical · Locally advanced / metastatic first line
EV-302 / KEYNOTE-A39
Clinical question
In untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, does enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab improve outcomes over platinum-gemcitabine chemotherapy?
Trial context
Intervention
Enfortumab vedotin 1.25 mg/kg IV days 1 and 8 q21d + pembrolizumab 200 mg IV q3w; control gemcitabine + cisplatin or carboplatin.
Comparator
Platinum + gemcitabine
Primary / key evidence
Median OS 31.5 vs 16.1 mo; HR 0.47. Median PFS 12.5 vs 6.3 mo; HR 0.45. ORR 67.7% vs 44.4%.
Absolute Effect
What changes for patients?
Median OS 31.5 vs 16.1 mo; HR 0.47. Median PFS 12.5 vs 6.3 mo; HR 0.45. ORR 67.7% vs 44.4%.
NNT/NNH: Not calculated unless a defensible fixed-time event-rate comparison was available in the cited primary analysis; median-survival differences alone are not converted to NNT.
Clinical interpretation
The combination produced large improvements in both PFS and OS versus platinum-gemcitabine in previously untreated advanced urothelial cancer.
Limitations / maturity
Interpret the effect in the context of the trial population, endpoint definition, follow-up and treatment era. Subsequent trials and evolving standards may limit direct applicability to contemporary patients.
← Return to The Absolute Effect
Current-practice context · reviewed 14 October 2026
EV-302 established enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab as a major first-line option for advanced urothelial carcinoma, improving PFS and OS versus platinum-based chemotherapy in the randomized population. Eligibility, access, neuropathy, skin toxicity, hyperglycaemia and immune-related adverse events should guide selection. Do not conflate this metastatic regimen with perioperative EV–pembrolizumab trials in localized MIBC.
EV-302 / KEYNOTE-A39 primary report ↗ · Current guideline guidance ↗