The Absolute Effect / Evidence / EORTC 30994
Bladder Cancer · Medical Oncology · Adjuvant

EORTC 30994

Clinical question

Does immediate adjuvant chemotherapy improve outcomes compared with deferred chemotherapy after radical cystectomy?

Trial context
Population
284 patients with pT3–pT4 and/or N+ M0 urothelial carcinoma after radical cystectomy
Intervention
Immediate adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy vs deferred chemotherapy at relapse
Key endpoint
5-year progression-free survival
Time horizon / follow-up
5 years
Absolute Effect

What changes for patients?

Immediate chemotherapy increased 5-year progression-free survival from 31.8% to 47.6%, an absolute improvement of 15.8 points (NNT 7). Overall survival was not significantly improved: 5-year OS 53.6% vs 47.7%, HR 0.78, P=.13. The trial closed early and was underpowered for OS.

NNT: 7

Treatment burden / harm

Grade 3–4 myelosuppression

NNH: Not applicable; toxicity comparisons are confounded by more patients receiving deferred treatment at relapse

Relative effect

HR: 0.54

95% CI 0.40–0.73; P<.0001

Clinical interpretation

Immediate adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy improved progression-free survival after cystectomy, but the trial was underpowered to prove an overall-survival benefit.

Primary publication

← Return to The Absolute Effect

Current-practice context · reviewed 14 October 2026

EORTC 30994 found improved progression-free survival with immediate adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy after cystectomy in high-risk urothelial carcinoma, but the trial closed early and did not establish a statistically significant overall-survival benefit. Current postoperative decisions include prior neoadjuvant chemotherapy, pathological risk, eligibility for adjuvant nivolumab and ctDNA-guided strategies, plus the changing perioperative treatment landscape.

EORTC 30994 primary source ↗ · Current guideline guidance ↗