The Absolute Effect / Evidence / EORTC 30992
Penile Cancer · Medical Oncology · Neoadjuvant/Locally Advanced

EORTC 30992

Clinical question

Can irinotecan plus cisplatin produce clinically meaningful responses in locally advanced or metastatic penile cancer?

Trial context
Population
28 patients with T3/T4, N1–N3 or M1 cisplatin-advanced penile carcinoma
Intervention
Irinotecan + cisplatin
Key endpoint
Objective response rate
Time horizon / follow-up
During treatment
Absolute Effect

What changes for patients?

Irinotecan plus cisplatin produced 8 responses among 26 eligible patients, an objective response rate of 30.8%. The study was designed to exclude a response rate below 30% but did not demonstrate that threshold statistically. There were 3 grade 3 diarrhoeas and 2 grade 4 neutropenic fevers. NNT is not applicable because this was single-arm.

NNT: Not applicable; single-arm phase II

Treatment burden / harm

Grade 3–4 selected toxicity

NNH: Not applicable; single-arm study

Relative effect

ORR: 8/26 eligible patients responded

80% CI 18.8–45.1%; prespecified threshold >30% not demonstrated

Clinical interpretation

The response signal is from a small single-arm phase II study and cannot establish comparative survival benefit or a standard regimen for advanced penile cancer.

Primary publication

← Return to The Absolute Effect

Current-practice context · reviewed 14 October 2026

EORTC 30992 is a small, single-arm phase II study and provides response-rate evidence only; it does not establish comparative survival benefit or a standard first-line regimen for advanced penile cancer. Management today is stage- and resectability-dependent, with multidisciplinary assessment, surgery when feasible and platinum-based combination chemotherapy considered for selected advanced disease. The historical irinotecan–cisplatin signal should not be extrapolated to all patients.

EAU penile-cancer guidance ↗ · EORTC 30992 primary report ↗