← Back to The Absolute Effect
Neuro-Oncology · Medical · Grade 3 Oligodendroglial Tumour · Adjuvant

In newly diagnosed anaplastic oligodendroglial tumours, does adding PCV chemotherapy to radiotherapy improve long-term survival, particularly in 1p/19q-codeleted disease? [EORTC 26951 / RTOG 9402]

In newly diagnosed anaplastic oligodendroglial tumours, does adding PCV chemotherapy to radiotherapy improve long-term survival, particularly in 1p/19q-codeleted disease?

Population
Two randomized phase III trials initiated in the 1990s, together enrolling more than 650 patients with newly diagnosed anaplastic oligodendroglial tumours; modern interpretation is anchored to IDH mutation and 1p/19q codeletion.
Sample size
EORTC 26951: 368 overall; RTOG 9402: 289 overall in the long-term report.
Intervention vs comparator
Radiotherapy alone versus radiotherapy plus procarbazine, lomustine (CCNU) and vincristine (PCV), given in neoadjuvant/adjuvant or concurrent trial-specific sequences.
Primary endpoint
Overall survival was the key mature endpoint; molecular subgroup analyses were prespecified/retrospectively integrated as the molecular classification evolved.

Absolute Effect

EORTC 26951 overall median OS 3.5 vs 2.6 years with PCV vs RT alone, HR 0.78 (95% CI 0.63–0.98), P=.033. In 1p/19q-codeleted disease, median OS 14.2 vs 9.3 years, HR 0.60 (95% CI 0.35–1.03), P=.063. RTOG 9402 codeleted disease showed median OS 13.2 vs 7.3 years, HR 0.61 (95% CI 0.40–0.94), P=.02.

Absolute effect: In the EORTC codeleted subgroup, estimated 20-year OS was 37.1% with PCV vs 13.6% without, an absolute difference of 23.5 percentage points. Because this is a molecular subgroup with limited sample size and the EORTC subgroup P value was .063, this should not be converted into a routine NNT.

NNT: not reported/calculated. The most striking absolute differences are in the molecularly defined subgroup, but the subgroup is relatively small and should not be treated as an independently powered NNT analysis.

NNH: not quantifiable from a single consistent fixed-time severe-toxicity endpoint across both historical trials.

Follow-up: Median follow-up 18–19 years.

Clinical results and treatment burden

Eligibility and clinical context

Two randomized phase III trials initiated in the 1990s, together enrolling more than 650 patients with newly diagnosed anaplastic oligodendroglial tumours; modern interpretation is anchored to IDH mutation and 1p/19q codeletion.

Limitations and maturity: The trials predate modern molecular classification, molecular imaging and contemporary supportive care. PCV is more toxic and cumbersome than temozolomide. The molecular subgroup results are the most clinically relevant but must be interpreted within the randomized parent trials.

Clinical interpretation

Very-long-term follow-up transformed these historical trials into molecular-era evidence: RT plus PCV produces durable survival benefit in oligodendroglial tumours, especially 1p/19q-codeleted disease.

Primary / authoritative source

Current-practice context · reviewed 14 October 2026

Long-term results of EORTC 26951 and RTOG 9402 support radiotherapy plus PCV chemotherapy for fit patients with IDH-mutant, 1p/19q-codeleted grade 3 oligodendroglioma. Modern diagnosis requires integrated molecular classification; do not apply these results to IDH-wild-type glioblastoma or to tumours without codeletion. PCV toxicity and treatment tolerance are important when discussing temozolomide alternatives.

EORTC 26951 / RTOG 9402 primary/long-term source ↗ · Current guideline guidance ↗