The Absolute Effect / Evidence / EORTC 22961
Prostate Cancer · Radiation · Locally advanced / high-risk

EORTC 22961

Clinical question

Is 6 months of ADT sufficient compared with 3 years when combined with definitive radiotherapy?

Trial context
Population
970 men
Intervention
RT 70 Gy + 6 months complete androgen blockade versus the same first 6 months followed by 30 additional months of triptorelin.
Comparator
36-month ADT
Primary / key evidence
5-y OS 81% vs 84.8%; short-term arm failed non-inferiority. 5-y prostate-cancer mortality 4.7% vs 3.2%.
Absolute Effect

What changes for patients?

5-y OS 81% vs 84.8%; short-term arm failed non-inferiority. 5-y prostate-cancer mortality 4.7% vs 3.2%.

NNT/NNH: Not calculated unless a defensible fixed-time event-rate comparison was available in the cited primary analysis; median-survival differences alone are not converted to NNT.

Clinical interpretation

Six months was not non-inferior to 36 months for overall survival; the study supports longer ADT in appropriately selected locally advanced/high-risk patients.

Limitations / maturity

Interpret the effect in the context of the trial population, endpoint definition, follow-up and treatment era. Subsequent trials and evolving standards may limit direct applicability to contemporary patients.

Primary publication

Bolla M et al. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2516–2527.

Primary publication / source

← Return to The Absolute Effect

Current-practice context · reviewed 14 October 2026

EORTC 22961 showed that six months of ADT was not non-inferior to three years when combined with radiotherapy for locally advanced/high-risk prostate cancer. Long-course ADT remains appropriate for many high-risk patients, with duration individualized to risk, comorbidity and newer treatment intensification; avoid treating short-course ADT as interchangeable with long-course therapy in all high-risk disease.

EORTC 22961 primary/long-term source ↗ · Current guideline guidance ↗