← Back to The Absolute Effect
Breast Cancer · Medical · Adjuvant Chemotherapy

DBCG 77B

In high-risk breast cancer, does adjuvant chemotherapy improve survival compared with postoperative radiotherapy alone?

Tumour site
Breast Cancer
Discipline
Medical
Clinical setting
Adjuvant Chemotherapy
Evidence type
Comparative clinical evidence

Absolute Effect

DBCG 77B randomized 1,034 high-risk patients after mastectomy and postoperative radiotherapy to no systemic therapy, cyclophosphamide, or CMF. At 10 years, survival was 45%, 60%, and 62%, respectively. This is foundational randomized evidence for adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk breast cancer.

NNT / NNH: Calculated only when a defensible fixed-time absolute event difference is available. Hazard ratios alone are not converted into NNT.

Clinical interpretation

The trial supports the historical principle that adjuvant chemotherapy can improve long-term outcomes in high-risk breast cancer, but its regimen is not a contemporary subtype-specific treatment guide.

Limitations

The study predates modern endocrine, HER2-directed and taxane-based therapy; current decisions must be based on tumour biology and present-day risk assessment.

Primary / authoritative source

Current-practice context · reviewed 14 October 2026

DBCG 77B is historical randomized evidence that systemic adjuvant chemotherapy improved long-term survival in high-risk breast cancer, but its regimens and comparator predate modern anthracycline/taxane strategies, endocrine therapy, HER2-directed treatment and current molecular risk stratification. It should be used as a historical proof-of-principle rather than as a regimen-selection guide for contemporary patients.

DBCG 77B primary publication ↗ · NCI breast-cancer treatment overview ↗