COSMIC-313
In previously untreated advanced clear-cell RCC with IMDC intermediate- or poor-risk disease, does adding cabozantinib to nivolumab plus ipilimumab improve outcomes over nivolumab plus ipilimumab alone?
Final efficacy and safety
Median PFS: 16.6 vs 11.2 months; HR 0.82 (95% CI 0.69–0.98) after median follow-up of 45 months.
Overall survival: no significant difference; OS HR 1.02 (95% CI 0.85–1.23; P=0.84). Median OS was 41.9 vs 42.0 months.
Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events: 75% vs 43%, an absolute increase of 32 percentage points with the triplet.
Critical appraisal
The final report reinforces the primary PFS signal but changes the clinical balance: the triplet adds a VEGFR/MET/AXL-targeting TKI to an established dual-checkpoint regimen, with a substantial increase in grade 3–4 toxicity. Exploratory M2-like macrophage findings are hypothesis-generating and are not a validated treatment-selection biomarker.
Interpret subgroup signals cautiously; the overall randomized population did not show improved OS. Toxicity included increased ALT and AST, and grade 5 treatment-related events occurred in approximately 1% in each group.
Current-practice context
As of 14 October 2026, COSMIC-313 should not be treated as establishing routine triplet therapy for all intermediate/poor-risk patients. Nivolumab/ipilimumab and approved IO–TKI combinations remain established first-line choices; triplet selection requires careful discussion of the lack of demonstrated OS benefit and greater toxicity, alongside local guideline and regulatory status.
Freshness note: targeted review of the 2026 final publication; broader guideline reconciliation remains ongoing.