The Absolute Effect / Evidence / BA06 30894
Bladder Cancer · Medical Oncology · Neoadjuvant

BA06 30894

Clinical question

Does neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy improve survival before definitive local treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer?

Trial context
Population
976 patients with muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer
Intervention
Three cycles CMV chemotherapy + definitive local therapy vs definitive local therapy alone
Key endpoint
Overall survival
Time horizon / follow-up
10 years
Absolute Effect

What changes for patients?

Neoadjuvant CMV increased 10-year OS from 30% to 36%, an absolute benefit of 6 percentage points (NNT 17). It also reduced metastasis or death. NNT is based on 10-year overall survival.

NNT: 17

Treatment burden / harm

Chemotherapy toxicity

NNH: Not quantifiable from the long-term publication; acute chemotherapy toxicity should be described rather than forcing an NNH

Relative effect

HR: 0.84

95% CI 0.72–0.99; P=.037

Clinical interpretation

The key clinical takeaway is the survival benefit of cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy before cystectomy in eligible MIBC; the original CMV regimen should be interpreted alongside newer perioperative options.

Primary publication

← Return to The Absolute Effect

Current-practice context · reviewed 14 October 2026

Neoadjuvant cisplatin-containing combination chemotherapy before cystectomy improves survival compared with local treatment alone in eligible muscle-invasive bladder cancer and established the rationale for perioperative systemic therapy. The historical CMV regimen is not the only contemporary option; current choices include gemcitabine–cisplatin-based perioperative approaches and, where appropriate, newer perioperative immunotherapy strategies. Renal function, hearing, neuropathy, fitness and local approvals determine eligibility.

BA06 30894 primary/registry source ↗ · Current guideline guidance ↗